Skip to main content
Free tutorial

Evaluating Competing Arguments Critically

Read the explanation, study the example, and practice at your own pace.

  • Communicative Objective: Develop the ability to compare opposing arguments, identify their strengths and limitations, distinguish evidence from assertion, and formulate a balanced critical assessment.
  • 5 Core Functional Sentences:
    1. Although both arguments are plausible, the first is supported by considerably more compelling evidence.
    2. The claim would be more convincing if it distinguished clearly between correlation and causation.
    3. What the opposing argument fails to account for is the possibility that several variables may be interacting simultaneously.
    4. Not only does this interpretation rely on limited evidence, but it also appears to generalize from an unusually narrow sample.
    5. On balance, the evidence lends greater support to the second explanation without conclusively disproving the first.
  • Grammar Focus: Inversion with negative and restrictive adverbials, concessive clauses, hypothetical conditionals, cleft constructions, and complex comparative structures.
  • Vocabulary Focus: plausible, compelling, correlation, variable, conclusively
Enjoyed this? Share it